Search for: "v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida et al" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2019, 8:48 am by Unknown
United States (Double Jeopardy) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.html Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:17 pm
Initially, a circuit court judge in Miami-Dade answered affirmatively to this question in Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of South Florida, etc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 3:27 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida (Tribal Sovereign Immunity) on 11/7/17.U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 3:27 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida (Tribal Sovereign Immunity) on 11/7/17.U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:21 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Double Jeopardy) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.html Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 1:37 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Reeves (Jurisdiction; Employment Law) Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 1:37 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Reeves (Jurisdiction; Employment Law) Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 6:55 pm
South Florida Water Management District, Case No. 3D09-2357, and Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, that transfer of water within a single body of water cannot constitute a “discharge” for purposes of the Act. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, that transfer of water within a single body of water cannot constitute a “discharge” for purposes of the Act. [read post]